<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo to follow Google&#8217;s lead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.affiliateblog.co.uk/yahoo-to-follow-googles-lead.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.affiliateblog.co.uk/yahoo-to-follow-googles-lead.html</link>
	<description>UK affiliate marketing news, views and podcast interviews.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliateblog.co.uk/yahoo-to-follow-googles-lead.html#comment-107150</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliateblog.co.uk/yahoo-to-follow-googles-lead.html#comment-107150</guid>
		<description>There is an element of copying going on with Yahoo! It seems as if they are trying to emulate what Google has already done.  Admitedly it must be hard for Yahoo! to come up with improvements which makes it difficult for them to digest.  But I do agree that they need to focus on the quality of PPC rather than that amount.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an element of copying going on with Yahoo! It seems as if they are trying to emulate what Google has already done.  Admitedly it must be hard for Yahoo! to come up with improvements which makes it difficult for them to digest.  But I do agree that they need to focus on the quality of PPC rather than that amount.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abi</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliateblog.co.uk/yahoo-to-follow-googles-lead.html#comment-32688</link>
		<dc:creator>Abi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliateblog.co.uk/yahoo-to-follow-googles-lead.html#comment-32688</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I really do think that yahoo adopting a performance based approach to ranking PPCs is long overdue. Emphasis on quality rather than how much money you can through at the ads. Gives newbies on a tight budget more of a chance.
My only question is when will Yahoo actually implement this?
 &lt;a HREF="http://www.affiliatemarketingintro.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Affiliate Marketing Introduction&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I really do think that yahoo adopting a performance based approach to ranking PPCs is long overdue. Emphasis on quality rather than how much money you can through at the ads. Gives newbies on a tight budget more of a chance.<br />
My only question is when will Yahoo actually implement this?<br />
 <a HREF="http://www.affiliatemarketingintro.com" rel="nofollow">Affiliate Marketing Introduction</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lamerton</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliateblog.co.uk/yahoo-to-follow-googles-lead.html#comment-32550</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lamerton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliateblog.co.uk/yahoo-to-follow-googles-lead.html#comment-32550</guid>
		<description>I'm still waiting for my account to be upgraded. I get the feeling that Y! are still trying to play catch-up with Google, and IMO, this update doesn't go far enough - it merely copies what Google have been trouncing them with for the last 5 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still waiting for my account to be upgraded. I get the feeling that Y! are still trying to play catch-up with Google, and IMO, this update doesn&#8217;t go far enough - it merely copies what Google have been trouncing them with for the last 5 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
